Can your job require a COVID-19 vaccine?

ABC News’ Andrew Dymburt reports on businesses weighing whether to require employees to get the vaccine when it’s widely available.

ABC News Live Prime, Weekdays at 7EST & 9EST
WATCH the ABC News Live Stream Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_Ma8oQLmSM

SUBSCRIBE to ABC NEWS: https://bit.ly/2vZb6yP
Watch More on http://abcnews.go.com/
LIKE ABC News on FACEBOOK https://www.facebook.com/abcnews
FOLLOW ABC News on TWITTER: https://twitter.com/abc

source

Author: avnblogfeed

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2022 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (AVNBLOGFEED.COM)

37 thoughts on “Can your job require a COVID-19 vaccine?

  1. Wow simply explained no vaccine – no employment , termination , & out the door it is ! Get it & just move on – that's best way work with it

  2. If you’re vaccinated you can still spread it to other people so stop lying to the people that if you’re vaccinated you are protecting people around you.

  3. Forcing people to take vaccinations or medicines against their will is rooted in white supremacy. Think Tuskegee Experiment or the forced sterilization of black women.

  4. My revenge thru the vaccine is clear 🤭🤣😂 everyone who wronged me left United States behind the vaccine 🤣😂 hehehehaha ahahaha hehehe if you want to know more just ask

  5. "Dyin' aint much of a livin' boy." Josey Wales. There is Hydrochloquine (1955), Ivermectin (1981) and Budensonide (1981), relatively safe and effective drugs which have been on the market for decades and recently shown and proven to halt the killer cytokine storm allegedly associated with Covid19. So, why would anyone in their right mind, opt to take a recently developed experimental gene therapy drug which irreversibly, genetically modifies your immune system, simply because they tore off the gene therapy label on the vile and slapped on a "vaccine" label!? "Vaccines usually take 8 to fifteen years to test for safety. This so-called "vaccine" was created in a matter of months. Please, pro-covid19 vaccine proponents, can you explain the logic in such a suggestion?

  6. Those are just EXPERIMENTAL VACCINES A LOT SIDE EFFECTS WILL COME just seat and wait…

    Why? Nobody can SUE Those Laboratories UNTIL 2024 in US?? Why? the Government protects these laboratories and Not their Citizens. Why 4 years of legal protection? Those labs do NOT have enough data to predict side effects from here to 1 – 2 – 3 or 4 years.Will Be Many DEAD? Irreversible Side Effects? Think about that…

  7. Nah I don't want my soul to be in hell for all eternity, sorry ABC news. But you can take it if you want more power to you, lol.

  8. Thanks to dr osaba on YouTube the great traditional healer who was able to get rid of my herpes virus after 14days of usage, I got tested and my doctor confirmed I'm completely free from herpes virus , dr osaba is reliable check him out on YouTube for help, thanks once more dr osaba may God continue to bless you.

  9. I'm a paramedic. It is a well known fact that every person that is deemed competent has a right to refuse any or all treatment offered/recommended to you. If after you refuse treatment, the healthcare professional continues to force it on you against your will, it's assault.

  10. This vaccine is not a vaccine It's Nanobiotechnology…. "Let’s make sure we are clear… This is not a vaccine. They are using the term “vaccine” to sneak this thing under public health exemptions. This is not a vaccine. This is mRNA packaged in a fat envelope that is delivered to a cell. It is a medical device designed to stimulate the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator. It is not a vaccine. Vaccines actually are a legally defined term under public health law; they are a legally defined term under CDC and FDA standards.[1] And the vaccine specifically has to stimulate both the immunity within the person receiving it and it also has to disrupt transmission. And that is not what this is. They (Moderna and Pfizer) have been abundantly clear in saying that the mRNA strand that is going into the cell is not to stop the transmission, it is a treatment. But if it was discussed as a treatment, it would not get the sympathetic ear of public health authorities because then people would say, “What other treatments are there? The use of the term vaccine is unconscionable for both the legal definition and also it is actually the sucker punch to open and free discourse… Moderna was started as a chemotherapy company for cancer, not a vaccine manufacturer for SARSCOV2. If we said we are going to give people prophylactic chemotherapy for the cancer they don’t yet have, we’d be laughed out of the room because it’s a stupid idea. That’s exactly what this is. This is a mechanical device in the form of a very small package of technology that is being inserted into the human system to activate the cell to become a pathogen manufacturing site. And I refuse to stipulate in any conversations that this is in fact a vaccine issue. The only reason why the term is being used is to abuse the 1905 Jacobson case that has been misrepresented since it was written. And if we were honest with this, we would actually call it what it is: it is a chemical pathogen device that is actually meant to unleash a chemical pathogen production action within a cell. It is a medical device, not a drug because it meets the CDRH definition of a device. It is not a living system, it is not a biologic system, it is a physical technology – it happens to just come in the size of a molecular package. So, we need to be really clear on making sure we don’t fall for their game. Because their game is if we talk about it as a vaccine then we are going to get into a vaccine conversation but this is not, by their own admission, a vaccine. As a result, it must be clear to everyone listening that we will not fall for this failed definition just like we will not fall for their industrial chemical definition of health. Both of them are functionally flawed and are an implicit violation of the legal construct that is being exploited. I get frustrated when I hear activists and lawyers say, “we are going to fight the vaccine”. If you stipulate it’s a vaccine you’ve already lost the battle. It’s not a vaccine. It is made to make you sick. 80% of the people exposed to SARSCOV2 are asymptomatic carriers. 80% of people who get this injected into them experience a clinical adverse event. You are getting injected with a chemical substance to induce illness, not to induce an immuno-transmissive response. In other words, nothing about this is going to stop you from transmitting anything. This is about getting you sick and having your own cells be the thing that get you sick. When the paymaster for the distribution of information happens to be the industry that’s doing the distributing, we lose. Because the only narrative is the one that will be compensated by the people writing the check. That goes for our politicians… and our media – it has been paid for – if you follow the money you realize there is no non-conflicted voice on any network."
    – Dr. David Martin, Jan 5th 2021

  11. You dont gather together because communists dont like gathering together….it makes them nervous.

  12. DO WE NOT LIVE IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA? LAND OF THE FREE, HOME OF THE BRAVE ? PEOPLE SEEM TO FORGET THAT
    “WE THE PEOPLE” ARE IN CHARGE HERE, WE PAY THEM TO DO THEIR JOB. WE ARE ALL SOVEREIGN HUMAN BEINGS, WE DONT HAVE TO ABIDE BY THINGS WHICH GOES AGAINST OUR WILL.WE DONT HAVE TO KEEP LIVING THE WAY WE ARE LIVING. UNNECESSARY SUFFERING FOR ALL BEINGS NEEDS TO END. WE HAVE TO FIGHT BACK WHILE WE STILL CAN BEFORE ITS TOO LATE. STAND TOGETHER, THAT IS WHAT THEY FEAR. LET THEM HAVE NO MORE CONTROL OVER YOU, YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU ARE BEING TOLD. ASK QUESTIONS, THINK FOR YOURSELF, DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH, LISTEN TO TRUTH ACTIVISTS WE ARE HERE WITH YOU NOT AGAINST YOU.

  13. It should be called the Holocaust Vaccine because it simply cannot be questioned.
    So the conclusion to be drawn from this video is that the way to protect yourself from the virus is NOT to get yourself vaccinated, but just ensure that all the staff at places you shop at get vaccinated. Mr Spock would say "fascinating".

  14. Apparently not because at the hospital I work at over half the nurses refuse to take the vaccine every one I've seen that is taking this vaccine is left the hospital miserable and in pain with their arm red and swelling. Oh yeah Bill Gates wants you to take it and dr. Fauci I wonder where they got their money talk about a fake shitshow

  15. So, you all want to go by the "science"… So, where is the science that proves a vaccinated person doesn't spread COVID19? Lay it on us all, let the medical community examine your proof.

  16. Seems like govt is trying to force this shot on people hmm what kinda poison is really in it? What sinister agenda are they really up to? 😒 pop control?

Comments are closed.