What does it mean to ‘pack’ the Supreme Court?

The idea of adding more justices to the Supreme Court or “packing” the court resurfaced after Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died in September.

SUBSCRIBE to ABC NEWS: https://bit.ly/2vZb6yP
Watch More on http://abcnews.go.com/
LIKE ABC News on FACEBOOK
https://www.facebook.com/abcnews
FOLLOW ABC News on TWITTER:

GOOD MORNING AMERICA’S HOMEPAGE:
https://www.goodmorningamerica.com/

#ABCNews #SupremeCourt #CourtPacking #Justices

source

Author: avn bot

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2020 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (AVNBLOGFEED.COM)

38 thoughts on “What does it mean to ‘pack’ the Supreme Court?

  1. It goes to 13 under this admin, then the next admin Republican, kicks it up to 19, then the next admin Democrat kicks it up to 25, etc, etc…Why even have a Supreme court then?

  2. So make it so the court will have all “liberals” in the near future. Man…. I thought the left hated dictators. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

  3. Quick answer? It means the demise of a free nation delivered into the hands of the "ruling class" scumbags "we" keep "voting" into office.
    "We win Georgia and we change Amerika!"
    …and the sheep says, "Ba-a-a!"

  4. Biden said Roosevelt was a bonehead for trying to pack the court and now we see that Biden Is just as boneheaded as he was and even more so actually

  5. The ONLY definition of “court packing” is increasing the number of Justices so it can be filled by the one expanding the court.. All other definitions are purely fictitious.

  6. The jurisprudence in my country is very erratic precisely because of term limits for justices. Absence of term limits of the judiciary ensures judicial independence and stability in the interpretation of the law.

  7. In the future America (2nd beast of Revelation 13 will form an image to the 1st beast(Papacy). Lamb like beast with 2 horns (separation of church and state)that will speak as a dragon (Through its LAWS). No wonder in the future there will be Sunday Law (forced Sunday worship/rest/false Sabbath) will be passed as prophecied which is the Mark of the beast because its the counterfeit of God’s true Bible Saturday sabbath/rest which Satan hates because Sabbath is a memorial of God’s creation and He as A CREATOR of all. This Sunday law, Whoever will not comply will be persecuted, killed, cant buy or sell. However God will save His people and the end will come. FYI: Not to mention 6 out 9 justices currently are Catholics.

  8. I wonder if the voters who voted Biden in would have voted for him if they new all the actions he is taking now…. He really did not tell any of his followers what he planned to do to help the people. Why did they vote him in…. I want to know why I am voting someone into power to run the country and help the people. Everything he is doing is to help him and his party…nothing about making life better for the people. As tax payers, can the people not step in and say “NO” , that’s not what we voted you in for. Especially on the court packing too… all for his own political selfishness to ‘control’ control’ control ‘. Speak up you American lefts before you are just a product and a pawn on the game board of the Elite’s who run him.

  9. If Georgia’s 2 senate seats flip to democrat, causing a 50/50 tie in the senate, democrats will be able to get as many justices in the Supreme Court as they wish. All 50 republicans will vote no, all 50 democrats will vote yes, and the tie would be broken by the VP, who will be Kamala Harris, who will surely vote yes.

  10. why not have
    5 justices appointed by Liberal Presidents
    5 justices appointed by Conservative Presidents
    5 justices appointed by the other justices via a Unanimous 10-0 vote.
    Take the politics out of the Supreme Court and Strengthen the Institution's power and prestige

    5 peer voted unanimous justices would be the most prestigious b/c they would be voted in on merit by their peers.

  11. They can pack it, and in another 4 years it will get packed again by the Republicans. The 2 parties can play this game until there's more judges than congressmen.

  12. The reason the writers of the Constitution do not set the number of Supreme Court justices is because the concept of judicial review isn't constitutional. Nowhere does it say that the Supreme Court gets to decide what the Constitution means. Why? Because in every situation, the answer is self evident. Anyone who has earned more than five dollars and can read can determine what is constitutional. How? Let the 10th Amendment been your guide. The 1st and 2nd Amendments also are obvious. We need to adopt more of the Roman Republic's Constitution. It lasted longer than ours.

  13. If the Democrats win the POTUS and the senate back (and that's a big if) and they then add 4 seats to the supreme court, the shooting will start. That will be an intentional move to destroy the check and balances of our government and force an ideology on the entire population. It will be met with the physical force that tyrants are always met with, throughout history. It will be violent and it will be quick.

  14. Ruth Bader Ginsburg: On Packing the Court – June 24, 2019  she said 9 was a good number. packing the court is wrong.AOC and Shumer are left wing power mongers looking to rule.

  15. Am I the only person that feel like the justice Supreme Court should not be life time positions and have limited terms just like the president?

  16. who the hell cares about the courts, or bidens son? is that all the trump sides got? its weak.. how bout that health plan to replace obama care? nothing haw, covid response- nothing.. we need action not some cheerleader tweeting all day. do ur job trump!

Comments are closed.