Iowa caucuses give Democratic candidates first test of voter appeal | Nightline

“Nightline” spoke to voters as Democratic presidential hopefuls spent the last 72 hours making their final pitches across the state.

WATCH NIGHTLINE EPISODES:
https://abc.go.com/shows/nightline

ALSO AVAILABLE ON HULU: https://hulu.tv/2wSmSrZ

#Nightline #IowaCaucus #Biden #Sanders #Buttigieg #Warren #Klobuchar #Yang #2020 #PresidentialCandidates #Politics #DemocraticCandidates

source

Author: avn bot

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2020 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (AVNBLOGFEED.COM)

21 thoughts on “Iowa caucuses give Democratic candidates first test of voter appeal | Nightline

  1. Im urging voters DO NOT OVERLOOK CANDIDATES THAT HAVE THAT EXPERIENCED OF WORKING WITH AND INSIDE THE WHITE HOUSE AS IN JOE BIDEN. I cant stress how important it is to have someone of that stature to lead US from this time of dividing US of the present person as TRUMP SHOWS US THE CONFUSING STATE OF OUR COUNTRY. The only person other then JOE BIDEN I TRUST IS BERNIE SANDERS who has done more for US then the other candidates excluding BIDEN. Warren is just about 1 thing as a singular strategy of convincing US it s all about FEMALES which I find discriminating the males in a insulting way and she is too blunt about it as I need a candidate that not use a Female or Male bias for we have surpassed the female agenda in 60s and its the minorities that need help more then gender. Buttigieg HAS PAST ISSUES OF NOT HELPING WITH MINORITIES ISSUES AND ONLY CARE FOR HIS OWN MINORITY GROUP which I find disturbing as we here in US still have morale concerns of our children. The other candidates wont make cut but IT S EXTREMELY IMPORTANT TO VOTE FOR THE CANDIDATE THAT HAS BEEN THERE BEFORE UNDER A GREAT ADMINISTRATION IN OBAMA, Its the same way how you choose candidate for a VERY IMPORTANT JOB. It s Biden or Sanders WE NEED TO PUT IN PLACE AS OUR Prez OR vice..

  2. The Democrats are a disaster. Who wants to vote for this? Cointossing, glitches, abuse of power in The House, a made up Russia Hoax. no real ideas or candidates that can stand up against Trump. Just virtue signaling, corruption, powerplay and chaos. The Democrats have become a parody of themselves. The only talkingpoints they have is how mucht they hate Trump and how they want to get him out of office.

  3. THE FACTS
    •Mayor Pete gave 40 grand to the app maker Shadow Inc
    •The app developers were former veteran's of Hillary's campaign running her tech
    •Mayor Pete's top political strategist Michael Halle is married to Tara Mcgowan
    •Tara Mcgowan is the Co-Founder of ACRONYM – Shadow Inc's parent company
    DRAW YOUR OWN CONCLUSIONS

  4. No one currently running for president qualifies by law. By law none of them can even hold the office they are now holding. It is also obvious none of them have even read the constitution and if they have then they know they are criminals and have no lawful claim to office.

    Cooper v. Aaron, By Chief Justice Earl Warren
    No state, legislator, executive or judicial officer can “War” against (or test the limitations of) the Constitution without violating their undertaking to support it (Breach of Oath/Contract, Treason, Fraud). The Constitution created a government dedicated to equal justice under law. The Fourteenth Amendment embodied and emphasized that ideal…no State shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Our constitutional ideal of equal justice under law is thus made a living truth. (Book, Our Nation’s Archive © 1999 pg 701)

    “Anyone entering into an arrangement with the government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the government stays within the bounds of his authority, even though the agent himself may be unaware of limitations upon his authority.” The United States Supreme Court, Federal Crop Ins. Corp, v. Merrill, 332 US 380-388 L1947)

    Any court, government or government officer who acts in violation of, in opposition or contradiction to the Constitution, by his, or her, own actions, commits treason and invokes the self-executing Sections 3 and 4 of the 14th Amendment and vacates his, or her, office.

    ” An officer who acts in violation of the constitution ceases to represent the government”. Brookfield Const. Co. v. Stewart, 284 F. Supp.94.

    AM14.3/HO, IR No person shall hold office if he rebels against or violates the U.S. Constitution (treason).

    AM14.3/RD Congress shall impeach anyone who rebels against or violates the U.S. Constitution.

    The Oath of office is a quid pro quo contract cf [U.S. Const. Art. 6, Clauses 2 and 3, Davis Vs. Lawyers Surety Corporation., 459 S.W. 2nd. 655, 657., Tex. Civ. App.] in which clerks, officials, or officers of the government pledge to perform (Support and uphold the United States and state Constitutions) in return for substance (wages, perks, benefits). Proponents are subjected to the penalties and remedies for Breach of Contract, Conspiracy cf [Title 18 U.S.C., Sections 241, 242]. Treason under the Constitution at Article 3, Section 3., and Intrinsic Fraud cf [Auerbach v Samuels, 10 Utah 2nd. 152, 349 P. 2nd. 1112,1114. Alleghany Corp v Kirby., D.C.N.Y. 218 F. Supp. 164, 183., and Keeton Packing Co. v State., 437 S.W. 20, 28].

    Refusing to live by their oath places them in direct violation of their oath, in every case. Violating their oath is not just cause for immediate dismissal and removal from office, it is a federal crime. Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement.

    5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”

  5. And this is the party that wants to manage trillions of dollars in healthcare, "climate change", and student loan bailouts? Gimme a break! What buffoons.

  6. Democrats want to take the White House eh? Can't even cheat Bernie properly a 2nd time in Iowa let alone have a chance in 2020…. Their hypocrisy is brazen…and they think the people are that dumb!

Leave a Reply