Maloney has heated exchange with Sondland | ABC News

Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney pressed the U.S. ambassador about the president’s desire for an investigation into the Ukrainian company Burisma.

Historic public impeachment hearing underway: Live updates and analysis https://abcn.ws/2KDSJnz

SUBSCRIBE to ABC NEWS: https://www.youtube.com/ABCNews/
Watch More on http://abcnews.go.com/
LIKE ABC News on FACEBOOK
https://www.facebook.com/abcnews
FOLLOW ABC News on TWITTER:

GOOD MORNING AMERICA’S HOMEPAGE:
https://www.goodmorningamerica.com/

#ABCNews #BreakingNews #Trump #Impeachment #Hearing #Politics #Sondland

source

Author: avnblogfeed

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2022 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (AVNBLOGFEED.COM)

36 thoughts on “Maloney has heated exchange with Sondland | ABC News

  1. Oh Maaaaaaaaan! Maloney is by FAR the the sexiest man in politics. He is on point and very well spoken. I must have watched this 20 times (not the whole thing – just where he get's sondland to admit to trump benefitting). His husband and his kids are very lucky indeed. WTG Maloney!

  2. Malone is a smart man. America would be a better country if there were more people like him in office. I adore the way he shut Sondland up in a very well spokenMatter of fact way. It was SEXY too! 🥰

  3. PPL HE SONDLAND DOESNT WANT TO ANSWER HIS BECAUSE HE HAS NO HARD ECVIDENCE OF TRUMP ASKING A QUID PRO. THE LINK IS BASED ON HIS ASSUMPTION, AKA A LIE. MALONY WANTS HIM TO BASICALLY LIE. SMH THIS IS FAKE NEWS.

  4. I've never seen a more disgusting example of leading a witness. I expected Patrick Maloney to actually demand "Say what we told you to"…

  5. Loved every second of this, Maloney! Crooks insinuating that they should be praised as heroes for admitting to something they knew very well and good they should have NEVER taken part in to begin with. #GTFOH

  6. Watching this, I feel like I'm back in elementary school lying to my school principal who knows I'm full of shit lol

  7. I feel like if every congressman were as skillful as Maloney, these hearings would be over already and Trump would've vacated voluntarily.

  8. The problem is that Maloney is not asking objective questions. Hes stating a conditional hiden behind what sounds like a fact. People do that all the time when they want you to answer the way they want to hear it. Not cool. Imagine someone asking you a question with an assumed fact..its not really a fact, it just sounds like one.

  9. Oh man all the comments on here are like "Maloney is such a MAN!" He literally does nothing but raise his voice at the guy and ask obvious questions that subsequently get answered. Sondland just sat and let him have his little fit. So weak.

  10. Maloney brought the hammer DOWN! Sondland took that jovial look as a "hail fellow well met" kinda harmless dude. But when he came at Maloney with that "Mr. Maloney, excuse me. I've been very forthright and I really resent what you're trying to do," Maloney's whole demeanor changed and he brought the hammer down; wiped that smug look right off Sondland's face. Thank you Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney!

  11. He had a smug on his face the entire time. I'm happy somebody called him out on it. Sondland is a crook just like the rest of the Trump administration! Congress should not allow people to amend their statements after evidence (i.e. FACTS) comes out that they lied. He should be going to jail like anybody else would be for lying under oath!!

  12. ABC selects clips to show something they want people to think but when viewing the complete testimony this clip reveals a completely false impression. Watch all of it and then make your own decision

  13. Who else would benefit from an investigation of Hunter Biden? The people of the U.S. and the Ukraine, when the deep corruption of Biden's influence peddling is ferreted out and exposed. These people would gain more from the investigation than Trump would, because the doddering old fool Joe Biden can't go more than a day without making some gaffe indicative of either a lack of native intelligence or the onset of dementia. He would never get elected President, and he's not a serious opponent to Trump. Trump would mop the floor with him on any debate stage. Bloomberg knows this. Deval Patrick knows this, and that's why they're getting into the race or thinking hard about it. There just isn't much political benefit to Trump in this, in terms of taking out Biden. If the Dems had any integrity, they would take down Biden themselves, especially after he bragged on video about extorting the Ukranians to fire the prosecutor investigating Burisma.
    — There is a political benefit to Trump, though, in getting the Ukrainians to investigate Burisma and the Bidens. Such an investigation would expose the corruption that the Dems and deep-staters put into setting up the Russian collusion scam. And as Schiff-for-brains has already reluctantly revealed, one of the persons that Vindeman spoke to was the (dog)whistleblower, which demonstrates that Vindeman is NOT a corroborating witness, but a co-conspirator with the (dog)-whistleblower in setting up this Ukraine impeachment scam.
    — It's probably a good bet that Biden only entered the race to gain some ostensible immunity from investigation through the election cycle, in the hope that Trump loses in 2020. After the growing uproar from Obama administration spying on the Trump campaign, it would be hard for Trump to investigate Biden, so the reasoning goes, and that's one of the legs that's supporting the current impeachment scam. Obama told Biden, "You don't have to do this," with regard to Biden's running for President. Obama probably knew that it would end in embarrassment, and that keeping a low profile might have been a better defense. Biden's candidacy is a ruse intended to keep Trump from investigating Biden's oafish corruption. Obama is smarter than Biden, and he wasn't going anywhere near endorsing him.

Comments are closed.