Mueller report: ‘Does not exonerate’ President Trump

The Mueller report states it “does not conclude that the president committed a crime.”
Read the FULL Mueller report: https://abcn.ws/2UI0ZdB

#ABCNews #Mueller #MuellerReport #Trump #breakingnews

source

Author: avn bot

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2020 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (AVNBLOGFEED.COM)

38 thoughts on “Mueller report: ‘Does not exonerate’ President Trump

  1. I love it… 1.9k thumbs down..little over than 900 thumbs up… there isn't any evidence that I have not committed a murder in my life…better come get me..because there isn't any evidence to exonerate me 😂😂 a 5 year old has better cognitive processing skills than these people. Talk about self conformation bias.

  2. Psychological aspect: Seemingly President Trump always believed He,
    himself, was not guilty of any collusion. Basic self defense mechanism
    kicked in, by suggesting investigations into such be dismissed. However
    after a thorough investigation, several individuals previously
    associated with Donald J Trump, have been indicted of financial
    improprieties. Yet no evidence of collusion was determined.
    Obstruction seems to be the key here as President Trump himself,
    expressed his preference to discontinue such an investigation. Seemingly
    a rational response to a seemingly irrational allegation?

  3. Psychological aspect: Seemingly President Trump always believed He,
    himself, was not guilty of any collusion. Basic self defense mechanism
    kicked in, by suggesting investigations into such be dismissed. However
    after a thorough investigation, several individuals previously
    associated with Donald J Trump, have been indicted of financial
    improprieties. Yet no evidence of collusion was determined.
    Obstruction seems to be the key here as President Trump himself,
    expressed his preference to discontinue such an investigation. Seemingly
    a rational response to a seemingly irrational allegation?

  4. How stupid can you be .why would a person already presumed innocent need to be exonerated when he wasn't even charged with a crime.every american is already exonerated untill proven guilty.and they couldn't prove him guilty.but he doesent require being exonerated he is already presumed innocent .You people all flunk the constitution or what .how stupid can you be?

  5. Cut thru the bullshit and it's easy to see that this argument is no less circular than it was before the report was released. If Trump was innocent of all these charges, why did he even HAVE to "fight for his political life"? He'd have saved himself and the nation much heartache if he'd simply cooperated from the outset with all requests for documents in the light of very odd scenarios like meeting a Russian spy chief behind closed doors as well as with Putin, having had business ties with them that go back many years, and, gosh, by a crazy coincidence, the Russians hacked our system, and in addition to that, replacing everybody in top positions with stooges. And we're still wondering what's under all that black blotting in the report. Some of us don't see that as exoneration at all, but a lot of unanswered questions, and, since Trump won't go after Russia about its cyberattacks we still need to worry about lapses in national security. Doesn't cut it.

  6. The prosecutor / investigator can look at "anything". And the special counsel of the collusion / obstruction investigation looked for about 2 years and still brought no charges. That's because the special counsel has not enough evidence that a prosecutor can use which will bring a verdict of guilt beyond a shadow of a doubt. That IS exoneration because no charges were brought – no case is brought to court because there's no proof of guilt beyond a shadow of a doubt. That's exoneration now. Maybe later someone else will find proof beyond a shadow of a doubt, but for now the case is dropped for lack of evidence.
    Since when does an investigator take on a case for a prosecutor for the purpose of finding proof of innocence of the accused? They don't. Why then include the phrase "does not exonerate"? I think there's a sly reason for including that phrase. For at least the last few years the most extreme left of the dems strongly desire to have their accusations accepted as proof of guilt, with no proof given, only their accusations. I think they are trying to shift the burden of proof of the guilt of the accused from the prosecution to prove guilt and shift the burden to the accused to prove their innocence. If they can use this report to introduce the idea that they can't prove the innocence of the accused that lack of proof by them also transfers to counsel for the accused that the accused must prove their innocence instead of providing a defense which shows at least a shadow of a doubt.
    Voters are watching the fallacies of the dems and the dems are on a path to self destruct because of their continuous convoluted shenanigans.

  7. Mr. Mueller's report to Mr. Trump is a game over. The rest is Mr. Barr, Mr. Mueller and Mr. Shiff. But Mr. Adam Shiff now looks like a bad guy, if they want to continue investigating, they will put their hands on their faces.

  8. They forget that in America, you are presumed innocent until proven guilty. "does not exonerate" is nothing more than saying "he did not prove his innocent". So the report assumed guilt until proven innocent and it could not.

  9. We never this to begin with the ones that were conculding with the Russian we're Obama and Hillary and the f.b.i. are the criminal and spying ,they are ones who were hiding Hillary emails ,Hillary don't know how to hide nothing. I sick of hearing about it. It so stupid.

Leave a Reply