Former U.S. attorney Preet Bharara reacts to Mueller report

Bharara, former U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, talks about the Mueller report findings and what it means for the president with other potential legal cases and investigations.

source

Author: avn bot

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2020 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (AVNBLOGFEED.COM)

35 thoughts on “Former U.S. attorney Preet Bharara reacts to Mueller report

  1. Obstruction!! Trying to thwart an investigation by asking for loyalty, firing officials investigating him. Clear obstructions. I never thought or believed he conspired with Russia. But not letting the justice department do its job in a nonpartisan way is wrong! If it was Obama or anyone else I promise I would say the same thing! This is about laws we have set in place, and what he did was against the law and would fall under the same acts as witnesses tampering. Trump is the living American dream, but no one is above the law!

  2. Our democracy is no longer; now, we have a capitalistic government run by the rich for the rich. WALL-law prohibits hiring illegal immigrants, enforce the law they will not come; however, only the rich benefit from hiring these illegal immigrants so that’s not going to happen. Wake up America, its time to tar and feather the corrupt.

  3. I wish people would think beyond sound bites. The 17 cases now open are not pardonable. There is a master plan in the making here. Sealed indictments also stop the clock on statutes of limitation on crimes. Trump will pay for his life of crime and all who enabled him.

  4. MUELLER dodged his responsibility. Passed on to Barr so when he says no obstruction he can take the heat. This was his chicken shit way of giving the Democrats a way to continue their phony harassment. This is what an attorney does when he has lost his case but still wants to throw shade on the defendant

  5. THE LIBERAL MEDIA LIED TO YOU FOR TWO YEARS, WHAT SHOULD BE DONE NOW? For two years, CNN, MSNBC and the rest of the Liberal fake news media assaulted their listeners eardrums with the endless and phony narrative that President Trump was guilty of Russian collusion, treason, and about 6 other crimes. Every single one of these fake news outlets didn’t just repeat the same story, their talking heads repeated word for word the exact same script, all in an effort to poison people’s minds that Trump was guilty. As we found out this weekend, none of that was true. Not one bit of it. So what should happen now? https://www.nowtheendbegins.com/fake-news-media-must-be-held-accountable-for-misleading-american-public-over-phony-russian-collusion-narrative-cnn-msnbc-maddow/

  6. Mr. Bharara was a U.S. attorney. He should be WELL AWARE that obstruction must be related to there being an underlying crime or legal proceeding. He's either (a) ignorant about the obvious legal issues here, that there's a complete lack of any legal foundation for obstruction, OR (b) he's a political operative that knows the facts but he'd rather support the continuation of a false narrative for a fake news program. Either way, Preet Bharara is not telling the obvious facts here (no collusion per Mueller, no obstruction per the AG). Decide for yourself what his motives are and whether ABC News seeks to share facts or fiction on this story.

Leave a Reply