President Biden addresses the nation on gun violence epidemic

ABC News’ breaks down key moments from President Joe Biden’s response to the latest mass shooting.

#MassShooting #MassShootings #Tulsa #Buffalo #UValde #uvaldeShooting #Texas

source

Author: avn bot

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2020 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (AVNBLOGFEED.COM)

23 thoughts on “President Biden addresses the nation on gun violence epidemic

  1. A deranged WOKE California Democrat has been caught near Judge Kavanaugh's house, plotting to murder him with a gun and a knife.
    When will BIDEN BE CHARGED with instigating this ACT OF INSURRECTION?

  2. It doesn't take a bright person to understand that people kill people, not guns. The gun can't pull it's on trigger. I mean are y'all going to ban knives that were used to kill people?

  3. Yeah let’s call it an epidemic while more opioid overdoses than ever while the government supplies paraphernalia for drug addicts.

  4. Federalist Paper 46 is Madison’s reasoning for the 2A:

    “That the people and the States should, for a sufficient period of time, elect an uninterupted succession of men ready to betray both; that the traitors should, throughout this period, uniformly and systematically pursue some fixed plan for the extension of the military establishment; that the governments and the people of the States should silently and patiently behold the gathering storm, and continue to supply the materials, until it should be prepared to burst on their own heads, must appear to every one more like the incoherent dreams of a delirious jealousy, or the misjudged exaggerations of a counterfeit zeal, than like the sober apprehensions of genuine patriotism.

    Extravagant as the supposition is, let it however be made. Let a regular army, fully equal to the resources of the country, be formed; and let it be entirely at the devotion of the federal government; still it would not be going too far to say, that the State governments, with the people on their side, would be able to repel the danger. The highest number to which, according to the best computation, a standing army can be carried in any country, does not exceed one hundredth part of the whole number of souls; or one twenty-fifth part of the number able to bear arms. This proportion would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men. To these would be opposed a militia amounting to near half a million of citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties, and united and conducted by governments possessing their affections and confidence. It may well be doubted, whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops. Those who are best acquainted with the last successful resistance of this country against the British arms, will be most inclined to deny the possibility of it. Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of. Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. And it is not certain, that with this aid alone they would not be able to shake off their yokes. But were the people to possess the additional advantages of local governments chosen by themselves, who could collect the national will and direct the national force, and of officers appointed out of the militia, by these governments, and attached both to them and to the militia, it may be affirmed with the greatest assurance, that the throne of every tyranny in Europe would be speedily overturned in spite of the legions which surround it.”

  5. If the age to buy guns is raised from 18 to 21, their are roughly 20 million individuals who would essentially have their 2nd amendment taken away by this change. This law would also have to change the voting age, and enlisting age. We don’t get to pick and choose what rights you get to take based on age. That’s ridiculous! One constitutional age needs to be a thing. Why does age constitute when and what rights are applied to individuals.
    WE THE PEOPLE!!! Are born in this country with our God given and constitutionally protected rights.
    As a minor it’s a parent’s obligation to defend their children’s rights until they are seen as adults in the eyes of the law. The point is, if we raise the age on one constitutional right then we must raise the age on all constitutional rights and if you can’t defend yourself with a gun legally then you shouldn’t be able to enlist and defend a bunch of hypocrites with a gun either or vote them into office.

  6. Buyback programs

    Raise the buying age to 21 or 25

    Make it a felony to leave weapons unsecured where a minor can access them

    No more sales to people with a history of domestic violence!

  7. Libs aren't worried about school-shootings.. Their track record on using abortion as birth control confirms this. ..what's the popular saying libs use when debating abortion on the streets?? Oh yeah, "eff them kids". (Yall can't have it both ways)

    Biden wants a ban on firearms because he's nosediving the country into oblivion, he knows that the people know this. So really, he's just trying to protect himself at the end of the day. After the ban he'll be surround with security that carry what? Anyone? Yup that's right, FULLY AUTOMATIC WEAPONS.

    You lib voters and normies need to wake TF up before its too late.

  8. I don't see how we can have a well-regulated militia with no school curriculum for it whatsoever. Not so much as gun safety. Most militia members are entirely unaware of their very membership, which starts at age 17 and not 21. Why doesn't the Civics curriculum cover all civic duties?

Comments are closed.