Rallies across country call for gun reform following tragic mass shootings | ABC News

Thousands of people at the March For Our Lives rally in the nation’s capital hope to put pressure on lawmakers for gun safety laws.

SUBSCRIBE to GMA’s YouTube page:
https://bit.ly/2Zq0dU5

SIGN UP to get the daily GMA Wake-Up Newsletter:
https://gma.abc/2Vzcd5j

VISIT GMA’s homepage:
https://www.goodmorningamerica.com

FOLLOW GMA:
TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@gma
Instagram: https://instagram.com/GoodMorningAmerica
Facebook: https://facebook.com/GoodMorningAmerica
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gma

#ABCNews #GMA #GunReform #MarchForOurLives #MassShooting

source

Author: avn bot

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2020 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (AVNBLOGFEED.COM)

26 thoughts on “Rallies across country call for gun reform following tragic mass shootings | ABC News

  1. It's only rampant in America. They don't want to revisit their Gun Laws because it is guaranteed in their constitution! So, clearly they don't know the distinction between " right" and "privilege". Gun ownership is not a right, it just a privilege because it is not inherent in individual to have it as it is not basic. And because it is just a privilege – it must be earned. And because it has to be earned – somebody has to pass certain criteria, clearance or test such as neuro test in order to be granted such same as a driver's license for example. Where on earth would you place right to safety, security and life over right to own a gun?

  2. In America citizens are allowed to own weapons.
    But you have strict rules about abortion.
    I really don't get it.

  3. "The Left keeps hollering about
    the need for new gun laws. Yet,
    they refuse to go after Hunter
    Biden for breaking gun laws that
    are already in place. It's all a
    sham.

  4. Here's an interesting fact. Did you know that every gov't/society that has implemented some sort of gun control measures where they completely stripped their citizens of a way to defend themselves from a tyrannical gov't all ended in mass extermination of that population?

    Here are a few examples:

    Turkey – 1911 gun control was established

    From 1915 – 1917 -> 1.5 mil Armenians unarmed were rounded up and exterminated

    Soviet union – 1929 gun control was established

    1929 – 1953 -> 20 mil people were rounded up and exterminated

    China – 1935 gun control was established

    1948 – 1952 -> 20 million political dissidents were rounded up and killed

    fyi, china is still under a brutal regime today

    Germany – 1938 gun control was established

    1939 – 1945 -> 13 million Jews and others were rounded up and exterminated

    Cambodia – 1956 gun control was established

    1975 – 1977 -> 1 mil educated people were rounded up and exterminated

    Guatemala – 1964 gun control was established

    1964 – 1981 -> 100k Mayan Indians were rounded up and exterminated

    Uganda – 1970 gun control was established

    1971 – 1979 -> 300k Christian believers were rounded up and exterminated

    In total, over 56 million people were exterminated in the 20th century alone

  5. Over 275 American mass shootings this year in the ONLY country on Earth that has school shootings.

    'Amend' means 'to change' or 'put right'. The US constitution has already been amended 27 times.

    Ban Americans from international travel to control the spread of stupidity and amend Amendment 2.

    American parents protest at school meetings about? A: School shootings B: Masks

  6. For everyone who says "guns aren't the issue, it's mental health," or "guns don't just get up one day, walk to a school, and fire themselves," I ask you: Would you apply that same reasoning to nuclear weapons? Certainly you don't believe that the world would be SAFER if civilians had access to weapons of mass destruction, do you? Then why do you REFUSE to acknowledge the empirical evidence PROVING that the prevalence of guns in a society results in more gun violence and deaths? For every 100 people living in America, there are 120 firearms. By comparison, in the next closest country, Yemen (which is currently embroiled in civil war), there are 52 firearms for every 100 people. We are OBJECTIVELY the least safe country in the developed world in terms of the gun homicide metric — it's not even close. So, tell me, why not apply your flawed "guns don't kill people, people kill people" reasoning to other weapons of war as well? I eagerly await THAT answer. The only halfway decent response I can think of is that nuclear weapons cannot be used in self-defense, to which I reply that in a dearmed society (like most of Europe, for example), you won't need to defend yourself against someone with an assault rifle. Period. My right to LIVE supersedes your right to own a weapon of war.

Comments are closed.