2 Americans fighting for Ukraine reportedly captured by Russian forces

The U.S. State Department said that they are aware of the “unconfirmed” reports about the two men who are said to be U.S. military veterans and are closely monitoring the situation.

WATCH FULL EPISODES OF WORLD NEWS TONIGHT:
https://abc.com/shows/world-news-tonight
WATCH WORLD NEWS TONIGHT ON HULU:
https://bit.ly/3iQLwPp
#WorldNewsTonight #ukrainecrisis #veterans #russiaukrainewar

source

Author: avn bot

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2020 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (AVNBLOGFEED.COM)

37 thoughts on “2 Americans fighting for Ukraine reportedly captured by Russian forces

  1. US soldiers have known to commit war crime, illegal bombing,
    assassination, torturing, invasions, rape,robbery, etc all-over the
    world and nobody dare to captured and punish them accordingly.
    Congratulation to Russia and the people of Donbass who dare to stand up
    against Americanos.//

  2. Good… Russia should get rid of them… At the end of the day, they went to fight as mercenaries (people paid to kill other people).. therefore there is NOT PROTECTION (Ginebra agreements) for them. Every single mercenary must be treated as such and therefore TERMINATED…. simple….

  3. What is the WORLD Wating for to STOP, the CRIMINAL, INVATION OF UKRAINE 🇺🇦 🙏 🙏 🙏 a SOVEREIGN, FREE COUNTRY by the PHSYCOPATH. DICTATOR of vladimir putin, he killed INNOCENT UKRAINIAN CIVILIANS, CHILDREN, ELDERLY PEOPLE, PETS, AND IS COMMITING A GENOCIDE, IT MUT STOP!!!!!!!!SLAVA UKRAINE 🇺🇦 🙏 🙏 🙏 PEACE PREVAIL 🇺🇦 🙏 🙏 🙏

  4. Prepare this is the long one but interesting I promise you!

    Do you remember how WW1 has begun? There's no one wanted to fight in WW1. Why? Because all that ignite the conflict were the incidents and clashes between Serbia and Austria-Hungary.

    But the Russian Empire was for the Serbian and Germany for the Austria-Hungary. And once Russia supported Serbs and Germany Austria.

    Bang, WW1 has begun by luring all other countries into the war. Yet no one wanted war, right? Results? Casualties estimate something around 20 million deaths and 21 million wounded.

    Wait a minute. What if someone had the nuclear warhead? How many people were dead in a case of the nuclear war back then? It's hard to estimate.

    Read on, I'm just at the beginning. WW2 was the second-largest war of the 20's century. Again, no one wanted the war. But basically, WW2 was the continuing of WW1 – because some German folks and specifically Hitler and rich people wanted a rematch. Now Hitler attacked Europe and lure the countries into the war.

    From 1939 till 1945, heavy casualties 85 million approximately by the end of 1945. But no one wanted the war, right? What if someone had the warhead back in the times of WW2? I think casualties would be significantly…significantly much more…

    Who knows about Cuban Missile Crysis? That was from 1962? Do you know that we were on the edge of the nuclear conflict? And the David Rockefeller was forced to travel to the Soviet Union to negotiate. He said: "We're on the edge of the thermo-nuclear conflict.

    One mistake and neither Soviet, nor United States, and the entire world will be any more". The matter was solved. But listen back then there were only 2 nuclear powers in the world. And today we have 9 countries if I'm not mistaken. Right?

    Remember that – David Rockefeller traveled to the Soviet Union to negotiate before anything bad happened. He wanted no "preventive strikes" because he was afraid or guessed about something.

    And afterward, when Robert McNamara (United States Secretary of Defense, serving from 1961 to 1968 under Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson) was asked about what prevented the nuclear conflict between US and USSR, he respond: "the luck".

    The cases number 1, it's interesting as I promised to: the deployment of the warheads that were considered aggressor acts and could lure the two powers to "humanity extermination" back in 1962. (So deployment, means nothing and powers, fortunately for all of us agreed to find the solution through negotiations: back to negotiations.

    Case 2: On October 27, 1962, The US pilot shut down over Cuba (the only combat victim of the Cuban Missile Crysis). It's funny though to remember what said Robert McNamara: “I thought it was the last Saturday I would ever see" However, it wasn't! The matter was settled down.

    The result and negotiations in the Cuban crisis: on October 26, Khrushchev sent a message to Kennedy in which he offered to remove the Cuban missiles in exchange for a promise by U.S. leaders not to invade Cuba.

    The following day, the Soviet leader sent a letter proposing that the USSR would dismantle its missiles in Cuba if the Americans removed their missile installations in Turkey.

    Officially, the Kennedy administration decided to accept the terms of the first message and ignore the second Khrushchev letter entirely. Privately, however, American officials also agreed to withdraw their nation’s missiles from Turkey.

    And on October 28, the crisis drew to a close.

    Both the Americans and Soviets were sobered by the Cuban Missile Crisis. The following year, a direct “hot line” communication link was installed between Washington and Moscow to help defuse similar situations, and the superpowers signed two treaties related to nuclear weapons.

    Plus we had two nuclear treaties: The SALT I Treaty, which was signed in May 1972, produced an agreement on two significant documents. These were the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM Treaty) and the Interim Agreement on the Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms.

    As you see everyone is happy!:) Unfortunately, Cold War progressed yet no nuclear war happened. My Gosh! Thank you interpreters that work back then:)

    Wonder what would happen if no one understood each other? Neither Soviets nor the US doesn't know what the opposite is talking about?:) I'm imagining the US general saying: What the hell? I can't understand anything….:)

    Well, today we have the "luck" divided by 7 (nuclear countries in addition to the US and Russia) chances for the starting of the last conflict of this civilization. (Casualties in the case? Well, one – everyone on the Earth) I wonder who wants to play this game?

    Now today, we have Ukraine and Russia clashes… No one wants the war, right? And nearly all countries are involved indirectly, just like in WW1 and WW2. But let me tell you the difference. In WW1 and WW2 there were no nukes by the end of the war (The only US in 1945).

    And today we have heavily armed countries with nukes that according to the SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institut), nuclear powers are planning to expand and modernize their nuclear capacities. Do you want to know what to expect then? Let me tell you one thing and then you judge it.

    But this is still too optimistic to think so… Because… Unfortunately, there're also concealed nuclear weapons in some countries…

    Here, visit this link to know almost all cases of the start of the accidental cases that could trigger the nuclear war.

    It's important to know to every politician, military, or authority:

    https://futureoflife.org/background/nuclear-close-calls-a-timeline/

    And lastly: preventive nuclear strike… What's the hell does that mean? If you watched the examples listed above, you'll see that "preventive nuclear strike must've been in all of the cases. But they don't. And humanity was safe.

    One person has no right to decide whether to start a nuclear war or not! That was the case with (President Richard M. Nixon that was clinically depressed, emotionally unstable, and drinking heavily.

    Thus U.S. Secretary of Defense James R. Schlesinger instructed the Joint Chiefs of Staff to route “any emergency order coming from the president”—such as a nuclear launch order— through him first (Schlosser 2013, p. 360).”

    Now I urge everyone, whether you a high-authority, military or civilian. Don't make a decision of such a "preventive strike" ever. Because you'll launch the "extermination of humanity".

    Believe me (or to scientists), every preventive strike will be punished by… God… I don't know. Somehow scientists think, that the nuclear strike, even a warning shot, leads to the "extermination… mutual… of the brothers and sisters of the Earth…

    Both rich and poor have their kids. I think they want to see their children's children playing around, walking to the high school, marriage, work, and so on and so forth.

    Thus I'm asking them: What's the point to be rich when there's no option to live? Why have power, when you can't use it? Why have authority that there's nothing relevant in it?

    For those who survive the blast, there're mutations are waiting that no one hasn't seen… That's how the human cell reacts to the high level of radiation… mutations…

    What to do? It's so simple I don't get why they're waiting for: Immediate meeting of (G8) nations at the table in the United Nations Office.

    Democracy has to be protected through a clear assumption that guessing or assuming whether to make the preventive nuclear strikes on some mythical threat is folly. And the 100% guarantee of the start of the non-mythical but the real nuclear exchange.

    I will tell you the effects of what will not happen: If VIP people think they can rely on policies from the previous centries, that's just faulty assumptions of the reality.

    Because back then you could stop the war through ambassadors or ceasing fire. Please tell me: How you can cease-fire in a case of a nuclear war? How do you know that the time for a cease-fire is coming or coming?

    You can't tell the warhead that flying: "Hey, can you fly slower? We're cease-firing here…"

    I always thought that approach when you have such a powerful weapon must be scientific, not the lay-people approach and gambling.

    The days of the World Wars are over…Just think about it – one more time… and humanity will be exterminated… The last consequences of the civilization… Why risk or even add 1 inch or 0,0001% of the possibilities?

    I wanted to end with the quote from Henry Kissinger: "There cannot be a crisis next week. My schedule is already full". I wish you all people a great life no matter where you live or what you're doing!

    I really want to shake hands with each one of you who read or has not even read this. Because I feel the part of humanity that requires protection today.

    Let's unite as countries of the united humanity and treat each other on the base of the law of justice and mutual assistance.

    Please re-post it, please! It takes some time to write such long monologues 🙂

  5. Why are Japanese, Americans, Koreans, poles, germans, turks and others are fighting against Russians and then asking for mercy?
    You are accusing Russians for war crimes and at the same time asking for forgiveness?

  6. this is a headline because some fools want to go there and be heroes they shouldn't be there in the first place… going to get us caught up and I'm f**** major nuclear event because these f** are putting boots on the ground when they're told not to.. you f**** jackasses

  7. These are the kind of people that do not need a weapon. They were in the military at some point now mercenaries for hire. Believing they are doing good they have a negative effect on most. Bad news they do not fall under the Geneva Convention any longer, the US should remain out of it. They went for money and think they are justified in killing for hire. So they got what they wanted plus, so leave them there.

  8. 1 billion dollars omg Americans should be mad by this just think of the schools hospitals that could be built have they looked at some of their city's recently n there society it's sick it needs so much work I wouldn't be surprised if a civil war breaks out before there next election.

Leave a Reply