DOJ officials oppose releasing affidavit behind Mar-a-Lago search

ABC News’ Aaron Katersky and ABC News legal contributor Kimberly Wehle discuss the potential legal implications of unsealing the affidavit that preceded the FBI search at Mar-a-Lago.

WATCH the ABC News Livestream: https://bit.ly/3rzBHum
SUBSCRIBE to ABC News: https://bit.ly/2vZb6yP
WATCH MORE on http://abcnews.go.com/
LIKE ABC News on FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/abcnews
FOLLOW ABC News on TWITTER: https://twitter.com/abc

#ABCNL #fbi #maralago #trump #affidavit #doj

source

Author: Rafael

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2022 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (AVNBLOGFEED.COM)

33 thoughts on “DOJ officials oppose releasing affidavit behind Mar-a-Lago search

  1. Trump does not really want the affidavid released he is only saying he does to keep the crazy train riled up. Just another game from the trump play book of deception.

  2. If they have nothing to hide then it would be released. And why are local affidavits released in crime cases but a ex president wants this released but we can't do it? All as fake as this news broadcast.

  3. The affidavit has names of witnesses. No way does that go public. Not with deluded Trumpers out there trigger-happy for anyone who hurts their messiah

  4. Who even considers releasing information on an ongoing investigation? Just because the focus of the investigation is an ex president, an ex president who has a history of intimidating people……

  5. Sure because it's all bs I thought the demacrats said there were transparent always wow if that was true it would be released talk about two faced lairs let's go Brandon let's go newsom

  6. That off of David carries the names of those that gave them information Trump and Fox News and Trump's allies want these names where they could Target these witnesses and these sources just like a mob boss trying to shut anybody up

  7. Merrick Garland should have a "meet with Jesus" session, privately, with intelligent GOP representatives, to explain, in kindergarten language, exactly what is at risk, which demands the secrecy of the affidavit.
    Let the intelligent GOP reps go back to explain to the GOP morons, why secrecy is critical.
    Apparently, the majority of the GOP would rather sacrifice lives than be out of the loop! 🙄🙄🙄

  8. I so want trump to go to jail
    Forever —- he has broken so many laws and has weaseled his way out w lawyers …
    I can’t wait to see him be behind bars!! — him And his Cronies!

  9. CONFUCIUS SAY: "ORANGE CHICKEN BAD" 🐔

    FBI SAY: "ORANGE CON MAN BAD GUILTY OF DOMESTIC TERRORISM" 🎃🧌

    USA SAY: CHUMP 232 BELONGINGS IN PRISON 🗝️ 💯🖕

    LOCK HIM UP

    THROW AWAY THE KEY 🗝️

    🇺🇸🇺🇸 TRUMP20TOLIFE 🇺🇸🇺🇸

  10. There are no snitches to find. It's all phony like the dossier, and the pretend whistle-blower Shiff kept referring to. Probable cause, we all know they can indict a ham sandwich.

  11. The AG of the USA (not a Trump sycophant as Bill Barr was and Jonathan Turley is) carefully balanced the public interest considering the target, national security and the evidence of crime. If it took three weeks then citizens should trust this esteemed jurist rather than challenging the top law enforcement officer in the USA because Fox or a drunken Don Jr or BOBB L HEAD says to..

  12. The affidavit is to remain sealed until trial during the discovery phase.
    This is to avoid tampering with evidence, witnesses, affiliates, etc. before trial if it ever goes trial.
    It is all laid out meticulously in the DOJ filing.
    This applies to most serious investigations and you damn well know it.
    Sure just give anyone being investigated for espionage all the details before trial.
    No-one is above the law in the USA right????

Comments are closed.