ABC’s Ian Pannell on frontline in eastern Ukraine

ABC’s Ian Pannell is on the frontline in eastern Ukraine, where Ukrainian troops are pitched against Russian-backed separatist forces amid fears Russia is planning a major new invasion.

#ABCNews #Ukraine #Russia

source

Author: avnblogfeed

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2022 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (AVNBLOGFEED.COM)

35 thoughts on “ABC’s Ian Pannell on frontline in eastern Ukraine

  1. Ukraine is one of the most corrupt countries in the world. It serves no purpose for America except to feed the industrial military complex. Russia can have it.

  2. Did you heard? Russia announce the creation of their new shooting range . "The Red Line Shooting Range"

    I guess it can be a superb business. On the Russian side of the border they set up shooting ranges, and everyone from the Ukraine side can shoot over the border….

    They create a phone app, and some website and sell subscription for shooters, and send them the results. Create championships, events for the "top ten tourists shooter….."Top ten activist shooter,"…."top ten journalist Sniper'…….too ten NATO sniper" …..they can even win a Free Ride in a Russian tank……you know…

    (For extra 300 they send you a 3d printed version of the Kremlin…with your name on it)…..and after they offer the money to the development of Ukraine….

  3. The key issues: if Ukraine joins NATO there naturally could be 'strike' weapons and other heavy weapons right on Russia's border. That conflicts with Russia's defence policy. So Putain has to object. Plus his voter approval ratings are dropping, so standing up to NATO may help as he wants to stay in power. That is the most important part and gets buried in many reports on the situation. If Mexico wanted to join Russia and have their firepower there Biden would be similarly forced to object, especally if it would help him win the next election.

    Also Ukraine signed a 1994 treaty to not have weapons which posed a threat to Russia. Although that is just a piece of paper, one could argue. Russia does want to continue to keep some control and over them, especially if Ukraine could negatively impact Russia.

  4. Afghanistan was American weapons versus Russian weapons.

    American and Russian arms and drug dealers became billionaires. Afghans died.

    Ukraine is American weapons versus Russian weapons.

    American and Russian arms dealers and oil companies become bigger billionaires. Ukrainians die.

  5. I'm glad US is taking initiative to aid Ukraine politically in defending their right to sovereignty. No country should be emboldened to bully its weaker neighbor into submission. Ukraine does NOT wish to be a part of Russia. Putin must be punished for his belligerence.

  6. If a foreign country decided to start arming a country that's right next to America, I'm pretty sure would be really pissed off. That's how Russia feels.

  7. Ukraine's CIVIL WAR is NOT any business of the US/nato. NATO needs to be disbanded WWII is over.
    " Not on inch Eastward…"
    Not one inch. With these words, Secretary of State James Baker proposed a hypothetical bargain to Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev after the fall of the Berlin Wall: if you give up your part of … NATO will "not shift one inch eastward."

Comments are closed.