Decorated combat veteran testifies about Trump-Ukraine call

Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman said he was concerned that the president was pressuring Ukraine’s leader and troubled by the U.S. ambassador to the EU’s behavior.

WATCH THE FULL EPISODE OF ‘WORLD NEWS TONIGHT’:
https://bit.ly/34cDlpB

WATCH OTHER FULL EPISODES OF WORLD NEWS TONIGHT:
http://abc.go.com/shows/world-news-tonight

#WorldNewsTonight #AlexanderVindman #Trump #Ukraine

source

Author: avnblogfeed

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2022 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (AVNBLOGFEED.COM)

31 thoughts on “Decorated combat veteran testifies about Trump-Ukraine call

  1. Bergdahl now has Vindman brothers to hang with
    PS ….. punishment, 24 hr loop “ how dare you “ speech, they’ll beg for water boarding instead

  2. Strange that he said Trump demanded an investigation because the transcript shows that Trump didn't "demand" anything. A cordial, relaxed phone call that Ukraine Presidents opinion of it matches Trumps, "it was friendly no pressure". FYI Its just been announced that Burisma Oil in Ukraine was in fact money laundering to Hunter Biden to the tune of 17+ million dollars, President Zelensky ran on fighting corruption this is well documented, we have to assume President Trump is concerned about giving money away tax payer millions without checks and balances in place (or balanced NATO support in the region). Point being they did get the money once proper channels were established and concerns were alleviated. This is also documented and remember Zelensky became President late April of this year, inaugurated May 20th 2019 so it makes sense that there was caution from the White House Zelensky was in office less than 2 months at that point, that is a fact that isn't being reported clealry. I've read the July 25th transcript myself, its easy to find as a PDF if you google it, read it yourself, I for one don't see any quid pro quo and knowing that VP Biden's son was on an Oil Company board where he didn't speak the language or have any prior talents or knowledge of that industry to warrant a seat should be investigated. You can bet if it was Trumps son there would be an investigation for sure, rightfully so, logically. So what are the Bidens afraid of? If there is nothing to hide. Lt Col Vidman is entitled to his opinion however this can hardly be described as conclusive or fact based evidence, but rather opinion that is not valid interpretation as only those in the conversation can conclusively define what they felt or what the conversation established and its demeanour . Much like art only the artists interpretation is the fact of the arts expression or meaning and the observer is merely an opinion. I think his heart is in the right place and he was pressured to testify but I wonder if he considers what Joe Biden said at the Council of Foreign Relations about NOT releasing the Billion dollars unless the Ukraine prosecutor that was investigating Burisma was fired was Quid pro quo? – LT Col Vindman discredits himself as bias if he says no, that is the question that should have been asked, if he had said yes then I think his opinion on the Trump matter would have held more weight especially being he is an expert on Ukraine. We may never know the answer. End of the day this whole impeachment appears to be hurting the Dems in key battle ground states more than anyone at this point and has really rallied the Republican base and is attracting a lot of independents in support for Trump also. #WalkingAway as a hash tag is something I am seeing almost everyday now. The plot thickens yet again. I predict the Senate will not only vote the impeachment down but exonerate trump of all charges. Then what? The last hail mary for a blue team win will be his tax records? Trump will win 2020 and I think the impeachment will be historically credited as a mistake at this rate. The Dems don't have anyone that can beat him decisively according to recent polls and the Trump economy numbers and consistent progress stats and numbers are hard to argue. Clearly Trump didn't win for his politically correct prowess but for 63 million Americans perhaps that was the whole point.

  3. I bet he maybe hearing the word FAVOR for a while,
    He truly gave a crazy testimony,
    A person demanding really did not even think of as a demand but, the word favor was a definite Demand 🤣😂😂😂😂
    I bet lots will say Vindman do me a favor 😂😂😂
    They may not even say will you
    He truly is a funny person 😂😂 😂

  4. Why was Vinman offered the Minister of Defense in Ukraine? 🤔 You figure it out. Why would he “disagree with POTUS’s policy?” 🤔You figure it out. Who would he want to protect? 🤔 You figure it out. Talk to his other commanders? Credible? Which politicians made millions in office? Ukraine? Can’t wait for you liars and leakers to explain why the criminals go to jail and the unethical get shamed. You are NOT reporting all sides of this. The MSM is NOT reporting all facts. You are anti-American. This is one of MILLIONS of military families SICK of you traitors. ❤️🇺🇸❤️🙌🏻

  5. 🆘 Alexander Vindman – just a reminder you’re only a Lt.colonel you don’t set Foreign policy. President Trump sets foreign policy and he’s your boss commander and chief in case you forgot. So good luck getting any kind of promotion anytime soon you moron.

  6. Emigrated to USA in 1979 from USSR. In other words, a Jimmy Carter Jew. Those were the ONLY ones let out of USSR in 79. But lying ABC won't tell us. They have had 678 B.S. stories about their Deep State criminal gang "impeachment" railroading against nobleman Trump.

  7. A retired Army officer who worked with Democrat "star witness" Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman in Grafenwoher, Germany, claims Vindman "really talked up" President Barack Obama and ridiculed America and Americans in front of Russian military officers.

    In an eye-opening thread on Twitter last week, retired U.S. Army Lt. Colonel Jim Hickman said that he "verbally reprimanded" Vindman after he heard some of his derisive remarks for himself. "Do not let the uniform fool you," Hickman wrote. "He is a political activist in uniform."

    "He was apologetic of American culture, laughed about Americans not being educated or worldly, & really talked up Obama & globalism to the point of (sic) uncomfortable.

    He would speak w/the Russian Soldiers & laugh as if at the expense of the US personnel. It was so uncomfortable & unprofessional, one of the GS [civil service]employees came & told me everything above. I walked over & sat w/in earshot of Vindman, & sure enough, all was confirmed.

    One comment truly struck me as odd, & it was w/respect to American's falsely thinking they're exceptional, when he said, "He [Obama] is working on that now." And he said it w/a snide 'I know a secret' look on his face. I honestly don't know what it meant, it just sounded like an odd thing to say.

    Regardless, after hearing him bash America a few times in front of subordinates, Russians, & GS Employees, as well as, hearing an earful about globalization, Obama's plan, etc., I'd had enough. I tapped him on the shoulder & asked him to step outside. At that point I verbally reprimanded him for his actions, & I'll leave it at that, so as not to be unprofessional myself.

    The bottom-line is LTC Vindman was a partisan Democrat at least as far back as [2013]. So much so, junior officers & soldiers felt uncomfortable around him. This is not your professional, field-grade officer, who has the character & integrity to do the right thing. Do not let the uniform fool you…he is a political activist in uniform. I pray our nation will drop this hate, vitriol & division, & unite as our founding fathers intended!"

  8. What a disgrace that a traitorous punk like Vindman would sell out his countrymen to gain brownie points with his deep state masters. Judas! I miss very much the two Purple Heart winners in my family that I knew as a child; the positive is that they don't have to witness how far we've fallen, where military officers, sworn to defend the Constitution, crap on it and betray our democracy.
    Vindman, you smug cowardly traitor. Judas!!

  9. Vindman is an insubordinate disgrace to the uniform partaking in a coup and sedition. If it wants to share his OPINION of his superiors he should resign his commission and never wear that uniform again. You should be courts martialed.

  10. As a military man he is in deep shit …. chain of command he should have just stuck with that militaries a little weird about that subject I would not want to be in his shoes

  11. Just remember AMERICA voted for Trump and won. Man he's doing something right look at how good the country is doing. See the real question is why are there spies in the White House. He worked for the Obama administration and does not like the president. 2020.. America is fucked if a Democrats wins. Maybe go live in Canada

  12. They were arguing because Schiff was not allowing the witness to answer a question asked about who the four people he spoke t about it were. Schiff is playing judge jury Lawyer and all around control freak! He is running a soviet style secret preceeding giving Republicans no ability to question witness's as they wish and they are only leaking things they view as damaging to the President in secret preceedings which should be open to the public! The whole thing is a sham. The President of ukraine already said he did not feel he was pressured in any way to do anything nor did he feel anything they spoke of was inappropriate.

  13. Insubordination pure and simple because it he didn't get his way. Move to the Ukraine if you love it so well. They probably don't want you either.

  14. As an officer, I questioned whether Lt. Col. Vindman should be involved I testimony against the Commander in Chief. As, I have thought about It, I believe that's what this is all about. We should feel we can have an open dialogue when we don't agree. That's what makes this country t b e best in the world…..

  15. I can't find a transcript of his testimony on any official government website. Does anybody know where I can get an official copy of the transcript so I can verify this?

Comments are closed.