Jury deliberations continue in Ahmaud Arbery case

ABC News Legal Contributor Channa Lloyd breaks down the prosecution’s closing arguments as jurors make final decisions.

ABC News Live Prime, Weekdays at 7 EST & 9 EST
WATCH the ABC News Livestream: https://bit.ly/3rzBHum
SUBSCRIBE to ABC News: https://bit.ly/2vZb6yP
WATCH MORE on http://abcnews.go.com/
LIKE ABC News on FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/abcnews
FOLLOW ABC News on TWITTER: https://twitter.com/abc

#ABCNL #AhmaudArbery #ClosingArguement #MurderTrial

source

Author: avnblogfeed

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2022 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (AVNBLOGFEED.COM)

50 thoughts on “Jury deliberations continue in Ahmaud Arbery case

  1. The McMichaels are simply scapegoats for alt left agenda gun control, there's simply nothing their constituency hates more than a Alpha minded chubby unattractive middle-aged heterosexual white male sporting an unkempt beard thats armed with an evil g…g…g…gun that's why even the baby-faced Kyle Drew their ire after one of the most painfully obvious self-defense shootings ever captured on camera

    It's logistically impossible to take guns away from people but you can make it impossible to use them even under circumstances that are so obviously defendable

    Once law-abiding citizens realize they'll go to prison for hurting a criminal that attacked them if they used a firearm in a perfectly justifiable way they will logistically stop purchasing firearms because they would become nothing more than a dangerous liability

    Kyle was a difficult Target because he was young, adorable and only shot white people while the McMichaels are the proverbial low-hanging fruit of this clandestine gun control strategy

    While well-intentioned the bumbling McMichaels arguably broke a few laws in their overzealous attempt to protect their neighborhood and their fumbling nervous demeanor makes it quite easy to pinch incriminating sound bites from their testimony with slick editing

  2. Unlike kyle rittenhouse's case, whereby the BIASED JUDGE left the jurors with a 36-page jury instructions to confuse them !
    Acting as the third defence, he got the killer off.

  3. What makes these White nationalists so special , this so-called defense attorney is using judicial malpractice what if we should have probable cause that they are domestic terrorists. ✓
    Beto O'Rourke for governor of Texas "For a better tomorrow"

  4. Maybe she shouldn’t have dated the trash who she was dating who, when the cops showed up, decided to start shooting them. The company you keep…

  5. I'm all for self defense, but I'm not really on board with hopping in the truck bed with a shotgun and cutting this guy off. I haven't been following the case as closely as Rittenhouse, which was definitely self defense. If I had to guess manslaughter for the guy who shot, aiding and abetting for the other two. It's kinda got a "Good ol Boys" vibe I'm not liking, not a good look. But like I said I haven't watched the trial so I could be completely off and wrong.

  6. Doesn't make two shits what verdict they come up with. The so called opressed a-holes will still piss and moan and threaten people.

  7. I see suspicious looking people in my neighborhood each day. But does that gives me a right to take the law into my own hands and be judge and executioner? Or is it still law, a man is innocent until proven guilty?

  8. Aubrey was murdered, they had no right to chase him down with guns. HOWEVER if they are not found guilty I foresee some OJ style riots right around the corner 😒

  9. Another one will get away with it until street justice catch up with them that's no way to live looking over your shoulder everyday for the rest of your life burbs or the hood it don't matter

Comments are closed.