Supreme Court takes up gun rights case on New York’s permit law

ABC News’ Devin Dwyer reports on one of the biggest Supreme Court gun rights cases in over a decade, deciding whether Americans can carry concealed weapons outside the home.

ABC News Live Prime, Weekdays at 7 EST & 9 EST
WATCH the ABC News Livestream: https://bit.ly/3rzBHum
SUBSCRIBE to ABC News: https://bit.ly/2vZb6yP
WATCH MORE on http://abcnews.go.com/
LIKE ABC News on FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/abcnews
FOLLOW ABC News on TWITTER: https://twitter.com/abc

#ABCNL #SupremeCourt #GunRights

source

Author: avnblogfeed

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2022 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (AVNBLOGFEED.COM)

30 thoughts on “Supreme Court takes up gun rights case on New York’s permit law

  1. DO YOU WANT TO LOSE YOUR GUNS?
    IF YOU VOTE FOR REPUBLICAN'TS, YOU'LL LOSE YOUR GUNS
    VOTE FOR DEMOCRATS 2022 AND SAVE YOUR GUNS
    How is this possible? 
    Here's how:
    Texas GOP passed an anti-abortion law that allows average citizens to sue anyone involved in an abortion performed in Texas… the doctors, nurses, admin people, etc etc… VIGILANTE LAWS… This concept goes far beyond abortion..  California will now pass a similar law regarding YOUR GUNS. Any citizen of California can sue anyone involved with a gun that has committed a crime involved in a gun accident.

    For example: If a person is murdered with a gun or a child or any person is killed or injured in a gun accident, then any citizen of CA can sue the gun manufacturer, the store that sold the gun, the ammo manufacturer, the trucker that transported the gun to the gun store… etc etc etc…..
    THE KEY HERE IS THE GUN AND AMMO MAKERS… THEY WILL GO BANKRUPT WITH ALL THE LAWSUITS…

    Other blue states will enact these same gun vigilante laws and that will be the end of guns in America. If you like this idea of TAKING YOUR GUNS AWAY then vote for REPUBLICAN'TS BECAUSE THEY CAN'T GOVERN FOR THE PEOPLE….

    VOTE FOR DEMOCRATS AND SAVE YOUR GUN RIGHTS AND SAVE ABORTION RIGHTS.

    Republican'ts are the ones who have enacted these "vigilante laws" .. .what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

  2. Oh and they should have showed a better training facility then the one that was on. And that's another thing. Take as much classes as you can before getting a pistol and as much practice as possible with any weapon, get into spot shoot, hunting ect. It will show how dedicated and responsible you are with a weapon.

  3. That's why they will only give you a sportsman if lucky enough. Even if you served in the military the state of NY can still say no. It's ridiculous! This is supposed to be a free country. But please tell me what's free about it!?!?

  4. we have conceal carry here in FL and were all ok here. idk what data the Albany mayor saw that said "less guns = less violence"…unless she left out Chicago

  5. The ONLY common-sense gun rules, REGARDLESS of the type of gun, is:
    1) Always treat a gun as if it's loaded..
    2) Always keep your fingers off the trigger until you're ready to shoot..
    3) Always know your target and its backstop..
    4) Always have your muzzle pointed in a safe direction..
    It's by following THESE simple 4 rules that's keeping gun owners, such as myself, safe for many years; and what's NOT helpful is the same ol' decades old dumb gun-control laws these wacky libtard politicians and media elites is trying to push on regular Americans

  6. Cathy is a fucking idiot

    An armed society is a polite society

    This will make dumb new yorker civil again

    more over these criminals that don’t care anout human life will die

    Win win situation

  7. It is a constitutional right of every qualifying American adult citizen to own a firearm and protect themselves. (under 18 doesn't qualify for many types of arms) Any community within the USA borders that doesn't support that is in violation of our constitutional right.
    Even though American citizens have the constitutional rights to own firearms and legally protect themselves there is the FACT: When millions of people feel and know they need to own firearms to protect themselves the countries law enforcement – for whatever reasons or excuses- has failed at providing a safe environment.
    Our constitutional rights are not the problem. The problem is another one of systems is a failure and our leadership for decades has been too incompetent to make the needed corrections. We could easily make a list of those. How many years have we suffered the incompetent "leaders" not being able to implement a sensible and effective immigration procedure/laws? Pathetic. The alarming mental crisis in America obviously goes from voters to the very top.

  8. That mayor is delusional. I'm sorry she had a tragedy close in her family and perhaps its clouded her objectivity on the issue. The fact the said the brother was killed by a gun means its likely an illegal weapon as they'd have made sure to point out if it was someone who was allowed to have it. Dude I wish there are millions of Sheryls out there. More law abiding armed citizens less crime, less gun deaths and murders, less gvmt overreach

  9. “To conquer a nation, first disarm its citizens”
    -Adolf Hitler
    Fight for 1A & 2A!! God Bless America!
    Tyranny is upon us! FJB!
    Prison should be hell on earth so criminals that do get out, will do anything to never go back again! Gun control should be putting violent criminals away for life & if they are convicted of murder, put them to death!

  10. At some point you sheep/leftists hacks will admit this .. The only reason your against lawful people carrying a firearm is “ Your voters are the one commiting felonies crimes and you know it !!
    That means your voting block starts shrinking drastically when people defend themselves ,
    FJB and his voters

  11. This last Wednesday our Supreme Court heard arguments in a landmark case on our right to carry a firearm outside the home for self-defense. One of the reasons given by the three liberal leaning justices in defense of New York’s permitting scheme is that guns are more dangerous in crowds and that within our large cities because of the very fact that so many people are around all the time as well as law enforcement, people don't need to carry a firearm for self-defence. Well it would seem that by the very nature of the term "High Crime Area" that obviously this premise is wrong.

    But here is one recent real world example of their theory not working.

    Raped on a train:

    For more than 40 minutes, a woman was harassed by a stranger on a public transit train in Philadelphia and then raped while bystanders held up their cell phones, seemingly to record the assault, while no one called 911 police said.

    Your fellow human beings folks. Not only did they fail to help this woman, they had such a lack of empathy for her, they could pull their phones out to record the attack for future social media postings! More than two dozen train stops passed as the man harassed, groped and eventually raped the woman, the police chief for the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority said at a news conference Monday.

    I'll say it again, unfortunately people are afraid to realize that the idea of being safe is an illusion in society. The reality is, to put it in the simplest terms, you're safe as long as the person standing next to you doesn't decide to kill you. That's not paranoia it's just an obvious fact.

    You know what would have empowered this poor woman to stop her stronger, bigger, male attacker??? A firearm, it would have made his choice to assault her because of his perceived power over her a bad choice. And hopefully he'd never be assaulting and raping any other women again!

    Just sayin…

  12. "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

  13. This rabid feminist above wants "guardrails" on my Second Amendment right to self defense outside the home. Maybe we should put "guardrails" on her free speech and limit what and when she has a right to say things!

Comments are closed.