Briefing Room: SCOTUS ruling on Indiana abortion law, Johnson & Johnson opioid trial, Trump returns

The latest politics headlines from Washington, DC.

SUBSCRIBE to ABC NEWS: https://www.youtube.com/ABCNews/
Watch More on http://abcnews.go.com/
LIKE ABC News on FACEBOOK
https://www.facebook.com/abcnews
FOLLOW ABC News on TWITTER:

GOOD MORNING AMERICA’S HOMEPAGE:
https://www.goodmorningamerica.com/

source

Author: avnblogfeed

ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2022 | HOSTING BY PHILLYFINEST369 SERVER STATS| & THE IDIOTS ROBOT AND CONTROL INC. |(RSS FEED MODULE)| ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS (AVNBLOGFEED.COM)

27 thoughts on “Briefing Room: SCOTUS ruling on Indiana abortion law, Johnson & Johnson opioid trial, Trump returns

  1. it is a woman's reproductive right to keep her legs closed.
    Do you get yourself infected with bacteria because you can get an antibiotic?
    Why is the Reproductive right of Men not consider?
    It is the Reproductive right of a Man who doesn't want abortion to at least get his Sperm back.

  2. What!?
    Drug companies don’t pass out the drugs. 🙄 Be carful how you handle this as you try to make companies liable. Once you do this then they will raise their prices (like doctors) because they have to be ready for those who sue them.

  3. getting women pregnant against their will could be considered negligence you know
    Woman can sue for damages
    Did he use a condom ? Maybe it will be illegal not to haha
    Hahahaha

  4. At what point do you keep track of ur age? When your born. Until your born its up to the parents to decide what to do. Im not pro abortion in fact i think its a nasty thing, but its a necessary thing for some people and it should be a womans choice and any man should not be able to have any say in the subject.

  5. I am an atheistic woman and pro-life. My position is based on 5 facts.

    1. It's alive
    2. It's human (and not a part of woman's body)
    3. The parents are the only ones responsible for the creation of a child (excluding rape) and the child bares no responsibility for being inside the mother, so parents have no right to kill it
    4. Even if the child was illegally parasiting on the mother, killing of a living human being is a usage of unnecessary force and our basic laws prohibit unlawful killing of innocent or killing altogether, it's uncostitutional and in conflict with basic human rights
    5. And if you're still not sure it is murder, that's actually an argument against abortion, because you should be 100% sure you won't. murder anyone

    1. I consider it alive. Living people have rights, dead ones don't. And there are many scientific proofs that life really begins at conception:

    https://www.princeton.edu/~prolife/articles/embryoquotes2.html

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/549308 (note that the Atlantic is a left-leaning magazine)

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/science-tells-us-when-life-begins-why-isnt-it-taught-in-the-classroom

    https://www.lc.org/newsroom/details/021519-life-begins-at-conception-1

    https://www.theculturewatch.com/dna-proof-that-life-begins-at-conception

    https://www.justthefacts.org/get-the-facts/when-life-begins

    https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2015/08/15520

    http://thefederalist.com/2017/10/13/life-begins-at-conception-says-department-hhs

    https://abort73.com/abortion/medical_testimony

    https://www.heartbeatservices.org/can-ru-486-be-reversed/item/848-41-quotes-from-medical-textbooks

    https://evolutionnews.org/2015/08/science_deniers

    https://lozierinstitute.org/a-scientific-view-of-when-life-begins/6

    2. I consider it human (And not a parasite. Humans are from the biological point of view no parasites and if you mean that they are parasites because they can't survive on their own (they can after the 2nd trimester), the same can be said about braindead disabled or injured people.)

    Fetuses have their own human DNA and organs. They match the definition of human body ( https://abort73.com/abortion/mothers_body/ ). They breathe and take in food through the umbilical cord, move and grow. The only think they can't do yet is to reproduce. And you don't have to be able to reproduce in order to live, because all the prepubescent children, elderly and infertile people are alive as well.

    You can see that it is alive and not our body. Pregnant women don't have two DNA codes or two brains and if she's expecting a boy, she isn't suddenly a transgender with XX as well as XY chromosomes (Bodily autonomy argument debunked: https://youtu.be/FcZ6IOjNbi0 ).

    What determines when it's human?
      Heartbeat? What about the people living with an artificial heart and a pacemaker?
     Brain function? Fetuses have a slightly different brain function because they dont use all of their senses yet and dont move much. Its like a sleeping person. And newborns have lesser brain function than us as well.
      Having  a brain? Brain begins to develop at mere 16 days after conception (1st paragraph in the text titled First trimester: https://www.whattoexpect.com/pregnancy/fetal-development/fetal-brain-nervous-system/ ).

    It's hard to say what's a developed brain. Most doctors consider it to be patially developed the 5th week after conception ( https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/pregnancy-week-by-week/in-depth/prenatal-care/art-20045302 ).

    Brain is actually fully developed in 20 or 30 years after birth ( https://mentalhealthdaily.com/2015/02/18/at-what-age-is-the-brain-fully-developed/ ).

    If you don't agree, I think that it should be considered at least parcially developed when baby moves its limbs at the age of 8 weeks ( 3rd paragraph in the text titled First trimester: https://www.whattoexpect.com/pregnancy/fetal-development/fetal-brain-nervous-system/ ).

    If you say that before 6 weeks it's not human because it has not fully developed arms is a bad argument because there are people without arms. Without legs, even without hearths who live with a artificial hearths. Human is a living integrated cluster of cells filled with human DNA. Nothing more. And every of those clusters of cells is worth equal protection.

    Does every human have to have fully developed organs and body parts as adults do? Shouldn't we then kill children because they have no permanent teeth? Thus, they are not fully human?

    Just as the universe began with the Big bang that arose from almost nothing, human life arises from almost nothing – only one egg and one sperm. Every single one species on this planet came into being as a single cell who in most cases didn't resemble the final mature individual. It lasts from days to months and years to grow up and fully develop. Humans need approxinately 20 years to fully mature. They go through various development stages as fertilisation, embryonic development, fetal development, neonatal phase, infancy, toddler phase, early childhood, preadolescence and puberty until they finally reach adulthood.
    I'm not making this up. Development of the human organism both prenatal and postatal is on Wikipedia ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Development_of_the_human_body ). You can clearly see that every scientific article regards embryos and fetuses as humans who just aren't fully mature yet – just like children.

    3. The partners are the only ones responsible for the creation of a child (excluding rape because first we have to talk about the restrictions on abortions on demand and then move to discuss the marginal cases (and child would be still innocent)) and the child bares no responsibility for being inside the mother

    The parents willingly participated in an activity which direct and very probable consequence is conception of a child. Therefore they should at least let it survive and give birth to it. It is similar to first aid. Why do you have to help someone  in need (And the difference between this and abortions is that you don't have directly help the fetus. Fetuses will live inside you as long as you don't kill them and killing someone is considered worse than just letting someone die and therefore  the sentence is much lower.)

    Pregnancy is a natural consequence of sex and everyone knows it. You can drive a car if you want, but take the responsibility for running over someone. You can't have sex if it results in hurting someone or in violating their rights. That's why we punish people for rape. Pedophiles can't have sex with children just because they're horny. Hence, you can't have sex and then kill the fetus.

    Abortion in a nonmaginal case is something like this:
    There is one person on life support and there's a nurse that is taking care of that person. The person is sure to wake up in 9 months. All the nurse has to do is to check the life support in order to keep it working. And she is the person that deliberately put this person to coma so she is responsible for the person's life. But she doesn't want to check it, so she unplugs the life support. Or more precisely, it's like when the doctor comes in and slits the throat of the person in coma.

    Do you think that if (someone else in case of rape and basically you and your partner in case of consentual sex) stuck a head in your window and they can't pull it out until 9 months, should you be allowed to legally chop off their head in order to have a view out of a window again?

    4. Even if the child was illegally parasiting on the mother, killing it is an unneccessary force and our basic laws prohibit unlawful killing of inocent or killing altogether, it's uncostitutional and in conflict with basic human rights

    You mustn't kill any innocent human being. Our basic fundamental laws prohibit that. The UN Universal declaration of human rights does in its 3rd article ( http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/ ) and the US constitution in the section 1 of the 14th amendment (https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=false&doc=43&page=transcript).

    The United nations grant it universally with no exception and condemn the capital punishment ( https://news.un.org/en/story/2017/10/568172-death-penalty-has-no-place-21st-century-un-chief-guterres ).

    The 14th amendment states that "state shall not deprive any person of life without due process of law." There are no babies being put on trial. And even if they were, they couldn't commit a crime in a uterus.

    5. And if you're still not sure it is murder, that's actually an argument against abortion, because you should be 100% sure you won't murder anyone. You shouldn't risk ending a human life at all. If we are to abort fetuses, we should be 100% sure that they are not human, not just 50% or less. Would you demolish a building if there is 50% chance that someone's inside, so you'd maybe kill some innocent people?

    I totally support contraception and getting dead fetuses out of mothers even if we cut their limbs and head off, but totally disapprove abortion of a living fetus.

    Do you agree?

  6. Abortion isn't a woman's right or choice… consenting to conceive is a choice, termination of life should involve all concerned (including the unborn)

  7. Thank God… Abortion is NOT BIRTH CONTROL… and the remains of the abortion (fetal remains) should be treated with respect… a heartbeat is life..!!

  8. No human is worth more than the other! The life that begins is not simply a continuation of the life of the sperm or egg cell. Rather, it is the life of a distinct, unique, new individual who has never existed before in history and will never exist again. Nothing will be added to the new organism except nutrition, and it will continue to grow and develop until death occurs due to injury or illness. It’s a scientific fact!

Comments are closed.