1770350776_maxresdefault.jpg

Ted Olson is a veteran Republican who successfully argued for former President George W. Bush before the Supreme Court in the Bush v. Gore case that decided the 2000 Florida recount. Olson served as solicitor general under Bush from 2001 to 2004, having previously worked for the Justice Department during the Reagan administration.

Watch Olson’s candid, full interview conducted with FRONTLINE during the making of the May 2019 PBS documentary “Supreme Revenge.”

This interview is part of FRONTLINE’s Transparency Project, an effort to open up the source material behind FRONTLINE’s reporting. View a version of this interview that includes an interactive text transcript, and explore dozens of other interviews shedding light on three decades of Supreme Court confirmation battles, on FRONTLINE’s website: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/interview-collection/supreme-revenge/

Watch the full documentary, Supreme Revenge, here: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/film/supreme-revenge/

Subscribe on YouTube: http://bit.ly/1BycsJW
Twitter: https://twitter.com/frontlinepbs
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/frontline

FRONTLINE is streaming more than 200 documentaries online, for free, here: http://to.pbs.org/hxRvQP

Funding for FRONTLINE is provided through the support of PBS viewers and by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Major funding for FRONTLINE is provided by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the Ford Foundation. Additional funding is provided by the Abrams Foundation, the Park Foundation, The John and Helen Glessner Family Trust, and the FRONTLINE Journalism Fund with major support from Jon and Jo Ann Hagler on behalf of the Jon L. Hagler Foundation.

source

42 thoughts on “Supreme Revenge: Ted Olson (first interview) | FRONTLINE

  1. Ted Olson, the traitor who went on every network (including Larry King) and told the world his wife called him from Flight 77 (hit the Pentagon) and laid the foundation for Muslims with box cutters hijacking airliners… The FBI, in the 2006 trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, under oath, made clear his claimed calls were of 'zero duration' – they did not happen. He lied! He cried fire in a theater and the world didn't jail him for life?! 9/11 is a lie based on this criminal's introduction to the great conspiracy. He didn't even mourn his dead wife; instead, he re-married another young, blonde lookalike (20 years his junior) like they all do…these alt-right, women-hating pervs.

  2. Bork just came across as a man who enjoyed gamesmanship too much. He didn't come across as prudent, cautious or contemplative. He conducted his interviews as if he enjoyed attention more than he enjoyed being a public servant. That made him dangerous to the people. He had an ego so enlarged he tripped over it.

  3. Bork just came across as a man who enjoyed gamesmanship too much. He didn't come across as prudent, cautious or contemplative. He conducted his interviews as if he enjoyed attention more than he enjoyed being a public servant. That made him dangerous to the people. He had an ego so enlarged he tripped over it.

  4. I was 14 when Borg was nominated by Reagan for SCOTUS.
    I recall Kennedys viscous comments. Although I was 14 at that young age I realized it was a terrible injustice.
    What the Dem's failed to foresee that tactic turned thousands of teens throughout America into future Conservatives.

  5. Ted Olson's Report of Phone Calls from Barbara Olson on 9/11: Three Official Denials. it has also been contradicted by the FBI. According to the FBI, therefore, Ted Olson did not receive a single call from his wife using either a cell phone or an onboard phone.

  6. Dem nominees generally are political hacks put on not to defend but to change the constitution, they deservie only derision and ridicule. The supreme court is a catch 22, if 5 of 9 agree to say up is down then by definition the constitution says up is down. Scurrilous bums

  7. Bork made himself unsuitable for the Supreme Court when he bowed down to Nixon and fired Archibald Cox in the 'Saturday Massacre' and then claimed he only did it because Nixon pressured him and he was going to resign afterwards. And then wrote later in his Memoirs that Nixon offered him the next Supreme Court nomination. I don't care what brilliant writer he was. He showed he could be corrupted and bullied. And Republicans need to get over defending him

  8. Democrats is leaning the china 🇨🇳 way control. The government people to work for them by force.
    Deny them to work them.
    Is china way of do things that person do not want to do.
    Democrats leaning china way to control the government people.
    To change the White House 🏠. Using what what ever it
    Take cover up there wrong doing. To get Trump out of the white house

  9. Is noone going to comment on how ridiculous his hair is???. How dellusional do you have to be to look at yourself in the mirror and tell yourself that looks good??? Lol

  10. It would've been an interesting tradeoff. Griswold and Roe would've been overturned, flag burning would still be illegal, Lawrence and Heller would've went the other way. What do conservatives care more about, abortion or guns?

  11. I wish that all men in positions of power would take a class and listen to professionals in this field (working with women who have been sexually assaulted, raped or harassed) and listen to some of the victims and what it’s done to them psychologically and emotionally and then maybe they could learn that no woman is going to testify falsely about assault. I’m not talking about “buyers remorse”. I think there are some women who make a bad decision and have sex and think they’ll get something from it like a promotion, movie part, whatever and when things don’t turn out the way they bargained for then they FEEL taken advantage of and they turn it into something it’s not. That’s very different from sexual assault and workplace harassment.

  12. Bork had proven to every voter in the country that he was morally bankrupt and ethically challenged (understatement.) Plus, he was the opposite of a centrist. It was just a dumb choice and I can't believe these guys still won't admit it.

  13. Ted Olson is among the most intelligent of conservative legal minds. Sadly, he also lost his wife on 9/11. She was a passenger on one of the planes. Some silly soul called him in RINO in the comments below but folks who just dump nastiness are online addicts seeking their dopamine fix. That also heightens limbic brain function at the expense of higher functions, hence the catchphrases with no intelligence attached. Bork was about Nixon pure and simple. And Olson declined to join Trump's legal team. Hence the venom from Trump zombies against him.

  14. It is especially interesting when he is asked about Kavanaugh and how the Kavanaugh he know was not the person that Ford testified him to be. He said the same thing about Thomas. What conservative men don't understand is that when men interact with other men- and when they interact with other women – that same man could be vastly different. Abusive men are socially considered to be the "salt of the earth". It does not mean they don't abuse women. For this reason, I sadly feel conservative men will never understand or believe women. Olson will never see the side of conservative men that are abusive – they are smart enough to know not to bring that side out.

  15. "A society deadened by a smothering network of laws while finding release in moral chaos is not likely to be either happy or stable."

    -Robert Bork

    Former Solicitor General of the United States

  16. I found the person conducting the interview to be bias towards the views of Mr. Olson. Not what I have come to expect from Frontline. And no questions about the controversial 2000 election decision by the Supreme Court, and Mr. Olson's part in that case? Pathetic.

  17. Robert Bork never lived down the reputation of being a political hack and front man for Nixon at the height of the Watergate scandal. Had Bork done what his superiors did and resigned rather than fire the special prosecutor to protect a criminal in the oval office he would have been placed on the Supreme Court without a single dissenting vote.

  18. It was a pathetic, shameful display by the DNC. I remember all the "celebrities" coming out to tell everyone "he wasn't the guy", even though they had no clue what they were talking about.

Comments are closed.